About Gabe:
Gabriel Sachwitz calls Anderson Island home with his wife, Claudia and their ten-year-old son. Sachwitz, was raised by his single mother in Minnesota. He learned the meaning of work ethic at the young age of 12 when he started to help with family bills by working at a family friend's farm.
Sachwitz has proven he could overcome anything; he dropped out of school to work multiple jobs throughout his teenage years to support himself. At the age of 20 he earned his GED and at 21 he joined the United States Marine Corps where he successfully completed two tours overseas. After being honorably discharged, Sachwitz went on to earn an associate’s and bachelor’s degree in mathematics along with a Master of arts in human behavior.
Prior to moving to Washington, Sachwitz taught mathematics, worked for the VA & was a Sheriff’s Deputy. He is currently a math teacher for a local school district and serves as a firefighter for the Anderson Island Fire/Rescue. Sachwitz serves on Anderson Island Citizens Advisory Board & is vice-president for the Riviera Community. He also volunteered for a veteran’s readjustment counseling center and as color guard/communications officer for American Legion Post 265.
In his free time Sachwitz enjoys spending time with his family, rock-climbing, hiking and riding his motorcycle.
Political Philosophy
My political philosophy centers around a comprehensive evaluation of legislation based on several key principles. Firstly, any proposed law must undergo scrutiny to ensure its compliance with both the U.S. Constitution and the Washington State Constitution, upholding the foundational legal frameworks of the nation and state.
Secondly, the degree of public consensus is vital. Legislation is most effective when it reflects the values of the people and is widely accepted. Nevertheless, a legislator is tasked with safeguarding the rights of everyone. For example, if the majority supports actions detrimental to the minority, it becomes the duty of the legislature to oppose the prevailing public opinion and ensure the protection of everyone’s rights.
Additionally, the practical implication of legislation is crucial. Each law should be assessed to determine whether it is likely to generate more problems than solutions or vice versa. I honestly believe that this logical framework can be universally applied to judge the merit of most legislative proposals.
For example, if we decide to modify freeway speed limits to 25 miles per hour based solely on the perception of safety or some feel-good idea, we inadvertently foster an environment that is riskier, and will erode the trust constituents have in the competence of their representatives. The practicality of law is paramount and shouldn’t be taken lightly. Random changes, based solely on the perception of safety, risk non-compliance and lose the respect of citizens.
In essence, legislation must earn the respect of the populace. Laws that appear unreasonable or lack societal consensus are unlikely to be followed. Citizens are more inclined to comply with regulations that they perceive as sensible, ethical, and aligned with their values. A key consideration is whether individuals would willingly adhere to a law, as laws perceived to be burdensome or unnecessary often result in people not following them.
Ultimately, my political philosophy revolves around the idea that legislation should be practical, constitutionally sound, widely accepted, and contribute positively to societal well-being.